Forum
Forum breadcrumbs - You are here:ForumSession Discussions: Session 10 - Critical Discourse Analysis - Franco ZappettiniComments and Questions from Prese …
Comments and Questions from Presentation
Susanne Winchester@susanne-winchester
general
22nd July 2020, 3:26 pm
Quote from Susanne Winchester on 22nd July 2020, 3:26 pmThese comments and questions were gathered during the presentation and discussion:
- Where does the role of how the human being interprets language fit in to CDA analyses?e. does the psychology of individual language processing have a place in CDA research?
- Do threatening discourses cause certain reactions that make legitimisation more palatable?
- Teaun A. van dijk's 'socio cognitive' approach
- What would be macro semantic propositions?
- Do you see synergies with phenomenology?
- To what extent do you have to align with the specific analytical categories that Wodak et al. propose to consider your work DHA. I take more of a functional grammar approach at the microlinguistic level but would argue that my work aligns with DHA in terms of the focus on context, as well as the alignment with text-immanent, socio-diagnostic and prognostic critiques...
- What is topos
- Does following DHA suggest a greater interest in more long-term historical context too?
- What is the connection between CDA and rhetorics? How can we merge these two?
Is CDA perhaps more of a school of thought and rhetorical analysis might be the approach?
These comments and questions were gathered during the presentation and discussion:
- Where does the role of how the human being interprets language fit in to CDA analyses?e. does the psychology of individual language processing have a place in CDA research?
- Do threatening discourses cause certain reactions that make legitimisation more palatable?
- Teaun A. van dijk's 'socio cognitive' approach
- What would be macro semantic propositions?
- Do you see synergies with phenomenology?
- To what extent do you have to align with the specific analytical categories that Wodak et al. propose to consider your work DHA. I take more of a functional grammar approach at the microlinguistic level but would argue that my work aligns with DHA in terms of the focus on context, as well as the alignment with text-immanent, socio-diagnostic and prognostic critiques...
- What is topos
- Does following DHA suggest a greater interest in more long-term historical context too?
- What is the connection between CDA and rhetorics? How can we merge these two?
Is CDA perhaps more of a school of thought and rhetorical analysis might be the approach?
Click for thumbs down.0Click for thumbs up.0